Futures-Diagnosis

Diagnosing the future of the Internet and innovation and their social impact

THE RISE OF ASIA’S CLEANTECH ‘SILICON VALLEYS’?

According to an article on Cleantechbrief.com Asian countries are poised to outspend the United States on clean energy infrastructure and technology by a factor of three-to-one through 2013.

A new report from the Breakthrough Institute and Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant states that the governments of China, Japan and South Korea will invest $519 billion in clean technology between 2009 and 2013, compared to $172 billion by the U.S. government. Climate and energy legislation, passed in the United States in June, would contribute $28.7 billion of the $172 billion five-year total. China alone will spend $440 billion to $660 billion over the next 10 years on cleantech.

The report which highlights the investment gap argues that “the United States will import the overwhelming majority of clean energy technologies it deploys.” It states that apparently 85% of U.S. President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus cleantech grants went to foreign firms suggesting the US is now lagging significantly.

Whatever your opinion on cleantech the report is important because it highlights an investment trend in longer-term research in Asia. Asian governments are taking a much more direct and coordinated approach while the US is characterised by a more “sporadic regulatory approach”.

Why is this significant? Because Asian countries by pursuing a more systematic approach are creating innovation clusters which combine universities, manufacturers, R&D labs, suppliers and other firms much like ‘the Pentagon helped create Silicon Valley in the fifties and sixties’. Ironically, these clusters will be attractive to US companies who are already making large investments in countries like China.

Private sector cleantech – China at the forefront

The success of Asia government strategy can already be seen in terms of the growth of private sector cleantech funding. Between 2000 and 2008 the US attracted $52 billion in private capital for renewable energy technologies; but China alone attracted $41 billion. However, China secured more private investment in this area than the US for the first time in 2008.

The report’s message is a big warning:

Small, indirect and uncoordinated incentives are not sufficient to outcompete Asia’s cleantech tigers…To regain economic leadership in the global clean energy industry, U.S. energy policy must include large, direct and coordinated investments in clean technology R&D, manufacturing, deployment and infrastructure.

The real question is whether there remains any belief or stomach for creating a new cleantech Silicon Valley in the US today. The short-term and increasingly risk-averse business and government culture of the past decades suggests this is not going to happen – unless fear of the East can be galvanised in a caricatured reenactment of the Cold War.

This report highlights how the shift away from longer-term thinking and the goals of pure research in the West is now being reflected in real investment and opportunity gaps. And this is just the beginning.

Filed under: Economics of Innovation, R&D and Innovation , ,

The rise of ‘China R&D plc’ – tomorrow’s global innovator

A new research report from Thomson Reuters titled, CHINA, Research and collaboration in the new geography of science highlights how significant the R&D shift is from West to East.

The report notes the following key trends:

  • China now ranks just behind the USA and Japan in terms of volume it allocates for Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD). China is now ranked above all the individual member states of the EU and is the largest contributor to GERD in non-OECD countries;
  • China’s output increased from just over 20,000 research papers in 1998 to nearly 112,000 in 2008, The nation doubled its output since 2004 alone. China surpassed Japan, the UK and Germany in 2006 and now stands second only to the USA;
  • China is heading to overtake the USA in output within the next decade;
  • China’s research is concentrated in the physical sciences and technology. Materials science, chemistry and physics predominate. Looking toward the future, rapid growth can be seen in agricultural sciences and life sciences fields such as immunology, microbiology, and molecular biology and genetics;
  • The USA stands out in terms of collaboration with China., US-based authors contributed to nearly 9 percent of papers from China-based institutions between 2004 and 2008;
  • But, regional collaboration expansion is notable, especially with Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Australia.

As the report authors note these trends are of enormous importance:

China’s new areas of investment take it along a different path. What is evident in the Thomson Reuters data is the pattern of rapid growth now in areas where China has had less presence in the past: biological and medical sciences. If growth is as rapid and substantial and the outcomes are as effective as they have been in other fields then the impact of this new research on gene and protein research and process innovation will be profound and pervasive.

China is not hanging about

The report demonstrates that China is not sitting around waiting for initiatives to come from the West or anywhere else. It’s just getting on with it. The research China is undertaking in the physical sciences and technology, with Materials Science, Chemistry, and Physics predominant might be seen as a pattern of the past. After all, these are areas of China’s traditional core strength rooted as they are in an economy which still has a preponderance of heavy industry and primary manufacturing. But the levels of investment in materials and related physical sciences is providing China with a strong innovation platform for modernizing these industries today and more so in the future.

More importantly, looking to the future, the notable growth areas are grouped in areas like Agricultural Sciences (the highest growth area which is understandable for the world’s most populous nation and its future food demands). But new areas are emerging too: life-sciences such as Immunology, Microbiology, and Molecular Biology & Genetics are expanding the most rapidly in terms of research paper output.

Long-term view not short-term pragmatism

The overwhelming picture the report presents is a country that is looking to the long-term. The levels of investment in higher education attests to a strong belief in the need to provide indigenous research capacities. The growth of China’s Higher education system over the past 25 years mentioned in the report is impressive:

  • The current number of students studying in Chinese universities has reached 25 million, a five-fold increase in only nine years;
  • There are more than 1,700 standard institutions of higher education;
  • 6% of them are Project 211 institutions (targeted as top universities), which take on the responsibility of training four-fifths of doctoral students, two-thirds of graduate students, half of students abroad, and one-third of undergraduates;
  • These institutions offer 85% of the State’s key subjects, hold 96% of the State’s key laboratories, and utilize 70% of scientific research funding.

An Asia-Pacific research base?

The report notes that the USA still stands out in terms of frequency of collaboration and co-authorship of research papers, with US-based authors contributing to nearly 9% of papers from China- based institutions between 2004 and 2008. It notes that the roster of contributing nations has remained largely stable between the five-year periods, although Italy and Russia have slipped slightly in recent years, while Sweden and the Netherlands have moved higher. Aside from Japan, Singapore currently occupies the highest rung of regional collaborators.

And it is this expanding regional research base that is really worth noting. As the report notes ‘Asia-Pacific nations are entirely happy to work with another’s (sic) excellent research bases now. They no longer depend on links to traditional G8 partners to help their knowledge development’.

This report highlights that China is rapidly developing a research capacity and a regional collaboration network that means it is developing an innovation capacity for the future which will no longer depend upon technology transfers from the West. It is not a question of quantity. China’s research into new materials will not only solve its problems, but perhaps provide the know-how to innovate for the entire world in this and other spheres.

As research spending declines in the West, this report highlights that we are going to be looking to the East to innovate to solve many of the key problems we will encounter in the Twenty First Century.

Filed under: Innovation, Science and Innovation ,

About futures-diagnosis

Categories

Archive

Follow me on Twitter

My del.icio.us tags